The High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 11138 of 2013 as infructuous because the petitioner's daughter had already secured admission, rendering the controversy academic.
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-ASWP11138-13.DOC
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11138 OF 2013
Nitin Jagdish Lad …Petitioner Versus Union of India, through Department of Higher …Respondents Education & Ors.
…Petitioner
Mr. S.S. Kanetkar , for the Petitioner.
Mr. Parag Vyas , with Mr. H.V. Mehta, for Union of India, Respondent No. 1.
Mr. C.P. Yadav , AGP, for the State, Respondent No. 3.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. PATEL, JJ. DATED: 20th January 2016
PC:-
1. In the light of the fact that the Petitioner's daughter has secured admission, it is apparent that the controversy is rendered academic and infructuous. The Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(G. S. PATEL, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 of 1
Nitin Jagdish Lad
Union of India
Department of Higher Education
S. C. Dharmadikari
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
