Dismissed
Sudarshan Kumar Tapuriah v. Axis Bank Limited and 10 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/197/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
910-OSWPL3306-15.DOC
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 3306 OF 2015
Sudarshan Kumar Tapuriah…Petitioner
Versus
Axis Bank LImited & 10 Ors.…Respondents
Mr. Sudarshan Kumar Tapuriah, Petitioner, absent.
Ms. Uma Fadia, i/b Mr. Shashank N. Fadia, for Respondent Nos. 1
and 5.
CORAM:S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
G.S. PATEL, JJ.
DATED:20th January 2016
PC:-
1.On the earlier occasion Mr. Sudarshan Kumar Tapuriah,
Petitioner was present in Court. In his presence, we recorded that
the Advocate then engaged Mr. Nishant Sangle has been discharged
and all the papers were taken away by the Petitioner from Mr.
Sangle. We recorded the request of the Petitioner appearing in
person before us to grant time so as to engage another Advocate. At
his request, we gave him more than adequate time.
2.The Petitioner thereafter engaged Mr. Sandeep Kumar as an
Advocate. The Petitioner was present in Court on both the
occasions, i.e., 4th December 2015 and 17th December 2015.
1 of 2
910-OSWPL3306-15.DOC
3. Today since the Petitioner and the newly engaged Advocate Mr. Sandeep Kumar is absent we have no alternative but to dismiss the Petition for want of prosecution.
4. The Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
2 of 2
Sudarshan Kumar Tapuriah
Axis Bank Limited
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court