Petitioner's counsel informed the court that the entire dues of the Bank were cleared and the writ petition was withdrawn. The High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Writ Petition disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP2487.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2487 OF 2015
M/s. Vishwanath Electrical Company, Aurangabad, Partnership Firm, Through its Partner, Vishwas S/o. Bhargav Joshi .. Petitioner
Versus
Janta Sahakari Bank Ltd., Pune (Multi State Scheduled Bank), Through Assistant General Manger / Authrized Officer and others .. Respondents
Shri Milind M. Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Respondent No. 1 served.
Shri Sharad V. Natu, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. Smt. A. V. Gondhalekar, A. G. P. for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 30TH JUNE, 2016.
PER COURT :-
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
sam/June.16
M/s. Vishwanath Electrical Company, Aurangabad
Janta Sahakari Bank Ltd.
S. V. Gangapurwala
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
