Writ petition disposed as infructuous without costs on hearing by the learned counsel for the petitioner that relief claimed has become infructuous with the passage of time.
Petitioner left to file appropriate application for restoration of legacy/record in the executing court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
914 sr. no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2010 OF 2015
MAHADEO SHRIRANG JADHAV VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. C.S. Deshmukh, Adv. h/f. Mr. D.P. Palodkar AGP for Respondents: Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 29th JUNE , 2016.
PER COURT:
1] Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that with the passage of time, the relief claimed in the petition has become infructuous. Writ petition is disposed of as such. No costs.
[K.K. SONAWANE] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
Mahadeo Shrirang Jadhav
State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
