Family Court appeals for conjugal rights were dismissed by this High Court bench on account of non-prosecution due to the absent counsel of the appellant.
Appeals dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of appellant's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.34 OF 2007
Sanjay Narayan Mahajan Vs. Swati W/o Sanjay Mahajan and another WITH FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.35 OF 2007 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.36 OF 2007.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.Vinod Patil, advocate for appellant absent. Mr.R.V.Gore, advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND K.K.SONAWANE,JJ. Date : 30.06.2016.
PER COURT :
2
stand dismissed for non-prosecution.
(K.K.SONAWANE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.30.06.2016. asp/office/Fca34.07
Sanjay Narayan Mahajan
Swati W/o Sanjay Mahajan
another
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
K.K.SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
