Allowed

Chetan Sanjiv Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC19 Jul 2016WP/2433/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed writ petitions of reserved category students admitted against reserved seats. The Court directed universities to declare results immediately and permitted students to continue studies, subject to pending caste verification, with a directive for the Scrutiny Committee to verify within eight months.

What did the court decide?

Directed College/University to declare result immediately; permitted petitioners to continue studies pending Scrutiny Committee verification; Committee directed to decide verification within eight mon

Chetan Sanjiv Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

wp243316.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2433 OF 2016

Chetan Sanjiv Patil

Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra & others Respondents

¶7

Mr.G.V.Wani, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2.

¶8

WITH

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO.7583 OF 2016

¶10

Vishal Divansing Patil Petitioner

¶11

Versus

¶12

State of Maharashtra & others Respondents

¶13

Mr.G.V.Wani, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.V.M.Kagane, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.Yogesh Bolkar, advocate for Respondent No.3.

¶14

WITH

¶15

WRIT PETITION NO.7587 OF 2016

Ritika Anil Rajput

Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra & others Respondents

¶20

Mr.G.V.Wani, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.P.S.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.Yogesh Bolkar, advocate for Respondent No.3.

¶21

WITH

¶22

WRIT PETITION NO.7734 OF 2016

¶23

Ruchi Jitendra Patil Petitioner

¶24

Versus

¶25

{2} wp243316.odt

¶26

State of Maharashtra & others

¶27

Respondents

¶28

Mr.G.V.Wani, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.Yogesh Bolkar, advocate for Respondent No.3.

¶29

WITH

¶30

WRIT PETITION NO.7738 OF 2016

¶31

Tejasvini Kumarsing Patil Petitioner

¶32

Versus

¶33

State of Maharashtra & others Respondents

¶34

Mr.G.V.Wani, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.B.Bharaswadkar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.Yogesh Bolkar, advocate for Respondent No.3.

¶35

CORAM : R.M.BORDE &

¶36

K.L.WADANE, JJ. DATE : 19^th July, 2016

¶37

PER COURT:

¶38

1 Petitioners claim to belong to reserved category and have been admitted to engineering course as against the seats earmarked for reserved category.

¶39

2 It is contended on behalf of respective petitioners that, since Respondent-Scrutiny Committee has not yet decided the proposals for verification of caste certificates in respect of petitioners, there are impediments in prosecuting further studies.

¶40

3 In the facts of these cases, these petitions can be disposed of by directing the concerned College/University to declare result of respective petitioners forthwith. Petitioners shall also be permitted to prosecute further studies and shall be entitled to be admitted to the next

¶41

wp243316.odt

¶42

{3}

¶43

semester/academic year subject, however, to the orders, those may be issued by the Scrutiny Committee in respect of verification of caste certificates of the petitioners; and it is accordingly directed to the concerned College/University. Respondent-Scrutiny Committee is directed to decide verification claims in respect of caste certificates issued to the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight months from today.

¶44

4 In view of the directions, as recorded above, writ petitions

¶45

are disposed of.

¶46

Civil Application No.10150/2016 in W.P. No.2433 of 2016

¶47

does not survive and stand disposed of.

¶48

Parties to act upon authenticate copy of this order.

K.L.WADANE JUDGE

R.M.BORDE

JUDGE

adb/wp243316

Chetan Sanjiv Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chetan Sanjiv Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gangabai Vitthalrao Ghuge Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Rustum Babasaheb Pawar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Syed Masood Kadri U/G Father Abdul Rahman Kadri Vs Shaikh Imran Shaikh Osman and Others

M/S Asht Bhuja Fire Safety and Multi Services and Enterprises Shoplet Thru Its Prop. Asht Bhuja Nat Vs the Union of India and Others

Dattatray Bhanudas Adatrao Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Jalindarnath Ramchandra Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others