This is a one-line interim order allowing an application for intervention without substantive reasoning.
Application for intervention allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
47 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5414 OF 2016
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3896 OF 2016
SYED MASOOD KADRI VERSUS
SHAIKH IMRAN SHAIKH USMAN & OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. H.D. Deshmukh AGP for Respondents: Mr. M.B. Bharaswadkar Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S.V. Dixit Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. B.R. Kaware Advocate for Respondent No.3 :Mr. D.K.Rajput
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K.L. WADANE, JJ. Date: July 18, 2016
PER COURT :-
( K.L. WADANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
SYED MASOOD KADRI
SHAIKH IMRAN SHAIKH USMAN
R. M. BORDE
K.L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
