A writ petition regarding a proposal tendered for consideration by the Municipal Corporation was disposed of. The court accepted the authority's undertaking to consider the proposal within four weeks, thereby redressing the petitioner's grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
66 WRIT PETITION NO. 2904 OF 2016
GANGABAI VITTHALRAO GHUGE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. V.D. Sapkal AGP for Respondents: Mr. P.S. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr.J.R.Shah
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K.L. WADANE, JJ. Date: July 18, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 Learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation states, on instructions, that the proposal tendered by the petitioner on 31.8.2015 would be considered and appropriate decision would be taken within a period of four weeks from today. Statement is accepted.
2 In view of the statement made, the grievance raised by the petitioner in the instant petition stands redressed.
( K.L. WADANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
GANGABAI VITTHALRAO GHUGE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
ANOTHER
R. M. BORDE
K.L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
