The Court directed the Education Inspector to decide the Petitioner's proposals for appointing two Shikshan-Sevaks within two months and framed an interim order. A hearing was listed for the Respondent.
Direction to Education Inspector to decide proposals on appointments within two months; interim order framed; hearing listed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
908-WP-2353-2016
WRIT PETITION NO.2353 OF 2016
Thamabai Ganpat Patil Shikshan Sanstha ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
Mr. A.V. Dhopatkar, for the Petitioner Mr. Kaushal Trivedi, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 05, 2016
P.C.:
1/2
Vishal Parekar
908-WP-2353-2016
of this Petition by directing Respondent-Education Inspector to consider and take appropriate decision on the Petitioner's proposals Exhibit C and D as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Respondent No. 1 on 10th October, 2016 at 3.00 p.m. The Respondent shall give opportunity of hearing him and then pass appropriate order in accordance with law.
6. The Petition stands disposed of as such.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Vishal Parekar
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Education Inspector should decide the appointment proposals of Shikshan-Sevaks expeditiously.
Whether an interim order should be framed regarding the appointment of teachers during the pendency of the proposal.
Thamabai Ganpat Patil Shikshan Sanstha
The State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
