The High Court at Bombay disposed of a writ petition without substantial argument after the respondent State Government placed a compliance order on record. The Court held that nothing survived in the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
POS-902-WP-1433-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1433 OF 2015
Arvind Properties Pvt. Ltd. & another ...Petitioners vs. State of Maharashtra & others ...Respondents
Ms. Yasmin Bhansali i/b. M/s. Yasmin Bhansali & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr. Mohit P. Jadhav, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4-State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 04, 2016
P.C.:
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Vikrant Elgire
Arvind Properties Pvt. Ltd.
another
State of Maharashtra
others
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
