This chamber summons allowed an amendment to a writ petition pending before the High Court of Bombay, to be completed within two weeks, and disposed of the application.
Amendment to the Writ Petition allowed to be carried out within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901.CHSW 127.16.doc
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 127 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1671 OF 2013
Deepak Dattatray Vertak .. Applicant In the matter between. Deepak Dattatray Vertak .. Petitioner Vs. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Siddharth P. Munghate, for the Applicant/Petitioner. Mr.G.Hariharan i/b Mr.Pankaj Kapoor, for Respondent No.3 -Union of India.
CORAM : SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR & M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 05th OCTOBER, 2016
P.C. :
. Matter is not on board. In view of urgency, taken up
in the production board.
1/2
901.CHSW 127.16.doc
( M.S.KARNIK, J.)
(SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Deepak Dattatray Vertak
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Union of India
SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR
M.S.KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
