Disposed
Naville Minocher Wadia and Dinaz Naville Wadia v. Sicom Limited and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/2350/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
oswp2350
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2350 OF 2016 WITH
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.390 OF 2016,
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.391 OF 2016,
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.394 OF 2016,
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.398 OF 2016,
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.400 OF 2016,
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.409 OF 2016,
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.410 OF 2016,
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.412 OF 2016.
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Pratik Amin a/w Ms Sneha Patil i/b Maniar
Srivastava Associates for the Petitioners
Mr.Nikhil Sakhardande a/w Mr.Kunal Katariya i/b AZB
Partners for the Respondent No.1.
Mr.P.J.Pandit for respondent No.2
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
M.S.KARNIK,JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 21, 2016
P.C.
1The learned counsel for the
petitionersseekspermissionto
withdraw these petitions in view of the
statement of the learned counsel for
the first respondent recorded in the
order dated 15th February 2016.
2Accordingly, the petitions are
disposed of as withdrawn. If fresh
2 oswp2350
notice for public auction is published,
it will be open for the petitioners to
challenge the same in accordance with
law.
(M.S.KARNIK,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
Cumulatively Petitioners
Respondent No.1
Respondent No.2
A.S. OKA
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court