Shri Hemant Dnyaneshwar Salve v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition seeking withdrawal was allowed. The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn by consent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-1078.16
sng
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1078 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri J.M. Patil for the Petitioner. Shri U.S. Upadhyay, AGP for the State.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ
DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER 2016
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner on instructions seeks permission to withdraw this Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
Petitioner
State
A.S. OKA
Anuja PrabhuDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court