Conservator of Forests and Anr. v. Kacharu Yedu Rankhambe
Bombay HCCAL/465/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
cal465
¶2
1
¶3
ssp
¶4
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
¶5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶6
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.465 OF 2011 IN
LETTER PATENT APPEAL ST.NO.910 OF 2011
¶7
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
¶8
None for the Applicant
None for the Respondent.
¶9
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 28, 2016
¶10
P.C.
¶11
1None appears for the applicant.
Time of three weeks from today is
granted to supply adequate number of
copies of this application for
effecting service of notice to the
legalrepresentativesofthe
respondent. If copies are not
supplied within stipulated time, this
application along with application
No.58 of 2011 shall stand dismissed for
nonprosecutionwithoutfurther
reference to the Court.
Coram
AI extract
A.S. Oka
Anuja Prabhu Desai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mohd.Khalid Mohd Shafi Qureshi Vs the General Manager,the Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undetaking and Anr.
Bipin Valechand Udani and Anr. Vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (Mhada) and 3 Ors.
Shri Hemant Dnyaneshwar Salve Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Oscorp Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sicom Limited and Anr.