Held that no eviction order exists; statutory proceedings under the Mumbai Government Premises Eviction Act, 1955 await initiation with mandatory hearing, rendering writ intervention unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1/2 2296.16-wp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 2296 OF 2016
Smt.Akshaya Ashish Kambali. ... Petitioner. V/s. State of Maharashtra and another. ... Respondents.
Bhushan C. Joshi for the petitioner.
A.I.Patel, AGP for the State.
CORAM : A.S. OKA AND C.V.BHADANG, JJ
DATED : 22nd February 2016.
P.C. :
Not on board. Taken up on the board.
skn 2/2 2296.16-wp
such proceedings are initiated under the said Act of 1955. In fact, the finding of the learned Principal Judge, City Civil Court in the order passed in the appeal preferred by the petitioner is that no order of eviction has been passed under the said Act of 1955.
(C.V. BHADANG, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ intervention is required given the petitioner has not been evicted and a statutory process with a hearing is pending.
Smt. Akshaya Ashish Kambali
State of Maharashtra
A.S. OKA
C.V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
