The court noted that the proposed scholarship for students from specific professions was considered, with eligible students benefiting. Finding the grievance redressed, the court held that no interference was called for and disposed of the petition.
The petition was disposed of dismissing the relief sought.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
916 WRIT PETITION NO. 2126 OF 2014
BHANUDAS LAXMAN SAKHARE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. G.J. Karne AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.S. Dande Advocate for Respondents No.5 to 7 : Mr. D.K. Rajput
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. Date: August 20, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 It is recorded in the affidavit in reply presented by the answering respondents that, the proposals for award of scholarship to the students belonging to the families engaged for uncleaned profession, were considered and 31 students are found eligible. The proposal for awarding scholarship to 31 students was forwarded and such of those students, who are found to be eligible have also been granted scholarship. So far as the ineligible students are concerned, their claims have been denied. Since the respondents have already taken steps in accordance with Policy prescribed by the Government, the grievance raised by the petitioner, in the instant petition does not deserve consideration. In case of any grievance in respect of students, who are found to be ineligible, aggrieved student or parent may approach this Court and appropriate considerations can be applied. It is informed that the wards of the petitioner have also been benefited under the Policy prescribed by the State Government. The petition is moved in the individual capacity. Since the grievance appears to have been redressed, no interference is called for.
( K. K. SONAWANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
Bhanudas Laxman Sakhare
State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
