Dismissed

Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs v. M/S Ghanshyam Auto Parts Pvt. Ltd.

Bombay HC19 Aug 2016FA/1215/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad permitted five connected first appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs against various companies to be withdrawn unconditionally in view of the disposal of underlying civil applications seeking withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

First appeals permitted to be withdrawn unconditionally and stand disposed of; pending civil applications disposed of accordingly.

Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs Vs M/S… — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1 FA-1215.04+ connected F.As

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

FIRST APPEAL NO. 1215 OF 2004

¶4

Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, N-5 Town Centre CIDCO, Aurangabad ...APPELLANT

¶5

versus

¶6

M/s Shree Ghanshayam Auto Parts Pvt. Ltd. Waluj, Aurangabad ...RESPONDENTS

¶7

Mr. Dwarkadas S. Ladda, Advocate for appellant Mr. A.P. Kolte, Advocate for respondent

¶8

WITH

¶9

FIRST APPEAL NO. 560 OF 2007

¶10

Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, N-5 Town Centre CIDCO, Aurangabad ...APPELLANT

¶11

versus

¶12

M/s Orion Laminates Ltd., Gut No. 24 Paithan Road, Aurangabad ...RESPONDENTS

¶13

Mr. Dwarkadas S. Ladda, Advocate for appellant Mr. A.P. Kolte, Advocate for respondent

¶14

WITH

¶15

FIRST APPEAL NO. 585 OF 2008

¶16

Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, N-5 Town Centre CIDCO, Aurangabad ...APPELLANT

¶17

versus

¶18

M/s V. A. Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. K-231, MIDC Area, Waluj, Aurangabad ...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Mr. Dwarkadas S. Ladda, Advocate for appellant Mr. R. M. Sharma, Advocate for respondent

¶20

2 FA-1215.04+ connected F.As

¶21

WITH

¶22

FIRST APPEAL NO. 940 OF 2007

¶23

Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, N-5 Town Centre CIDCO, Aurangabad ...APPELLANT

¶24

versus

¶25

M/s K. M. Re-Rolls Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 2D-56,Addl. MIDC Area, Jalna

¶26

...RESPONDENTS

¶27

Mr. Dwarkadas S. Ladda, Advocate for appellant

¶28

WITH

¶29

FIRST APPEAL NO. 1746 OF 2008

¶30

Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, N-5 Town Centre CIDCO, Aurangabad

¶31

......APPELLANT

¶32

versus

¶33

M/s Varsa Plastic Industries Pvt. Ltd. ...RESPONDENTS

¶34

Mr. Dwarkadas S. Ladda, Advocate for appellant

¶35

Mr. S.S. Deo, Advocate for respondent – Absent

¶36

WITH

¶37

FIRST APPEAL NO. 1092 OF 2007

¶38

Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, N-5 Town Centre CIDCO, Aurangabad ....APPELLANT

¶39

versus

¶40

M/s Shree Om Re-/Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. D-51/2, MIDC Area, Jalna

¶41

...RESPONDENTS

¶42

Mr. Dwarkadas S. Ladda, Advocate for appellant

¶43

3 FA-1215.04+ connected F.As

¶44

WITH

¶45

FIRST APPEAL NO. 261 OF 2006

¶46

Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, N-5 Town Centre CIDCO, Aurangabad ...APPELLANT

¶47

versus

¶48

M/s Ketan V. Shah and anr. ...RESPONDENTS

¶49

Mr. Dwarkadas S. Ladda, Advocate for appellant Mr. R. P. Shendurnikar Advocate for Resp. 1 & 2

¶50

WITH

¶51

FIRST APPEAL NO. 1126 OF 2008

¶52

Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, N-5 Town Centre CIDCO, Aurangabad ...APPELLANT

¶53

versus

¶54

M/s Sant Eknath Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. Aurangabad. ...RESPONDENTS

¶55

..... Mr. Dwarkadas S. Ladda, Advocate for appellant Mr. P. G. Rodge Advocate for R/sole

¶56

CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

¶57

DATED : 19^th AUGUST, 2016.

¶58

Order :-

¶59

In view of disposal of civil applications seeking withdrawal of

¶60

first appeals, present first appeals are permitted to be withdrawn unconditionally and stand disposed of.

¶61

Pending civil applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.

¶62

Sd/Sd/-

¶63

MTK

Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs v. M/S Ghanshyam Auto Parts Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs v. M/S Ghanshyam Auto Parts Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ratnamala Laxman Mirajgave Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Nankdishor Babanrao Shahagadkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sambhaji Ashokrao Tate Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs Vs Katan v Shah and Anr.

Ananda Ganpati Tamanboinwad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sarika Manohar Vankar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others