The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition by observing that petitioners could tender appropriate representation to the employer for sympathetic consideration of their claim.
Representation to be tendered to employer for consideration of claim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
911 WRIT PETITION NO. 8951 OF 2016
PRASHANT SHANTILAL SHIRSATH AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. P.A. Kulkarni AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.S. Dande
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. Date: August 20, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 It would be open for the petitioners to tender appropriate representation to the employer for consideration of their claim sympathetically. If such representation is made, the respondent Company may consider the same.
( K. K. SONAWANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
PRASHANT SHANTILAL SHIRSATH AND OTHERS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
R. M. BORDE
K. K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
