The State of Maharashtra v. Maruti Daulu Kurane
Case brief
What is this about?
VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 2100-06
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 2100 OF 2006
The State of Maharashtra … Petitioner Vs. Shri Maruti Daulu Kurane … Respondent
Mr. V. B. Thadani, AGP for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 1, 2016
PC.
. It appears that rule was issued on 4.4.2006. Office note indicates that notice which was issued to the Respondents was returned unserved with the remark “retired on September, 2005”. In view of this, petition does not survive and is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/Sd/[M. S. SONAK, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
The State of Maharashtra
Shri Maruti Daulu Kurane
M. S. Sonak
V. M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court