PIL disposed of by directing the petitioner to make a representation to the appropriate authority. Liberty to apply was granted. No substantive issue decided.
Directed petitioner to make representation to appropriate authority; liberty to apply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
skc
921-CRPILST-20-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (ST.) NO. 20 OF 2016
Sandeep s/o. Rajmani Shukla .. Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. A. M. Saraogi for Petitioner. Mr. J. P. Yagnik – APP for State.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE AND M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 29 JULY 2016
P.C.:
1] The petitioner may make a representation to the appropriate authority in respect of the grievance made by him in this petition. The said grievance shall be considered in accordance with law and may be decided expeditiously.
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
(V. M. KANADE, J.)
chandka
1 of 1
Sandeep s/o. Rajmani Shukla
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
