Petitioner withdrew a writ petition regarding a dispute within the State of Maharashtra, seeking an alternative remedy from the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal instead of the High Court.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the M.A.T.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1907.16wp
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
______________________________________________________ 61 WRIT PETITION NO.1907 OF 2016
LAXMAM MHASU DARADE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner: Mr.Shermale K.N.
AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.S.K. Kadam.
...
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
Dated: JUNE 13, 2016
Heard.
2There is no dispute that there is
remedy available fore the Maharashtra
Administrative Tribunal.
3In that view of the matter, the
learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks
liberty to withdraw the petition so as to
avail an appropriate remedy before the
M.A.T.
4The petition is dismissed as
1907.16wp
2
withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Needless to observe that, in case,
there is prayer for condonation of delay
in filing Original Application before the
M.A.T., the Tribunal will consider
pendency of this petition.
(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J)(S.S. SHINDE, J)
kadam/
Laxmam Mhasu Darade
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court