The High Court held that the controversy was no longer res integra as it was covered by a prior Division Bench judgment. Consequently, relief was denied and the civil application was disposed of, with interim relief vacated.
The petition stands rejected; the civil application stands disposed of; interim relief is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4711.16ca
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
______________________________________________________ 11 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4711 OF 2016 IN WP/12275/2015 AND
WRIT PETITION NO.12275/2015
POONAM MAHADEO PARDESHI AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Applicants : Mr.Suryawanshi Nitin B.
AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.S.K. Kadam.
Advocate for Respondent 3 : Mr.Mukul Kulkarni.
...
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. Dated: JUNE 13, 2016
… Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. There is consensus between the learned Counsel for the parties that the controversy raised in this petition is no longer res integra and covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in case of Pravin Bhima Shinde and others vs The State of Maharashtra and others (Writ Petition No.6110 of 2014) decided on 8.1.2016.
4711.16ca
2
2In that view of the matter, we are
unable to persuade ourselves to grant the
relief to the petitioners.
3In the circumstances, the petition
stands rejected. Consequently, the civil
application stands disposed of. Interim
relief, if any, stands vacated.
(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J)(S.S. SHINDE, J)
kadam/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to relief given the matter is no longer res integra and covered by a Division Bench judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pravin Bhima Shinde and others vs The State of Maharashtra and othersFollowed¶14
Pravin Bhima Shinde and others vs The State of Maharashtra and others (Writ Petition No.6110 of 2014)
Poonam Mahadeo Pardeshi and others
The State of Maharashtra and others
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court