Disposed

Shriram Yeshwantrao Jadhav 7 Ors. v. State of Mah and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Nov 2016WP/1583/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition seeking appointment as trained teachers. Observing that the petitioners' purpose was redressed via prior interim orders and that petitioners had not provided further instructions, the court dismissed the petition while leaving disputes regarding pay-scale or arrears for separate consideration. No costs were awarded.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition stands disposed of in terms of the interim orders previously passed. Petitioners free to approach Management for any disputes regarding pay-scale or arrears of salary.

Shriram Yeshwantrao Jadhav 7 Ors. Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

W.P.No.1583/05

¶3

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶5

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.1583 OF 2005

¶7

Shriram S/o Yeshwantrao Jadhav and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶9

Court's or Judge's orders

¶10

Mr.U.R.Awate, advocate holding for Mr.S.B.Talekar, advocate for the petitioners. Mrs.V.N.Patil, A.G.P. for the State. Mr.V.D.Gunale, advocate for Respondent Nos.4 to 7.

¶11

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND K.L.WADANE,JJ. Date : 23.11.2016.

¶12

PER COURT :

¶13

Heard.

¶14

On 21.11.2016, the interim orders were passed in favour of the petitioners, whereby the Respondents were directed to grant provisional approval to the appointment of the petitioners as trained teachers as before with effect from 17.1.2005 and continue to release salary to the petitioners as trained teachers pending decision of this petition.

¶15

Learned counsel for petitioners states that inspite of communicating with the petitioners, they have not instructed him about further development. We had disposed of the connected Writ

¶16

¶17

Petitions bearing W.P.No.4620/2005 and W.P.No.4632/2005 on the basis of the statement of the learned A.G.P. that the services of the petitioners have been approved in the said Writ Petitions.

¶18

In the present matter also it appears that the purpose of the petitioners stands redressed.

¶19

In case the petitioners are still in service and no adverse orders are passed and if they have completed the postal D.Ed. then the Writ Petition stands disposed of in terms of the interim orders. In case there is any dispute with regard to the pay-scale paid to them or in respect of arrears of salary then the petitioners may approach the Management and/or authority concerned which would be considered by the authority and/or Management in accordance with law.

¶20

Rule accordingly made absolute in above terms. No costs.

¶21

(K.L.WADANE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)

¶22

Dt.23.11.2016. asp/office/wp1583.05

¶23

¶24

W.P.No.1583/05

Shriram Yeshwantrao Jadhav 7 Ors. v. State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shriram Yeshwantrao Jadhav 7 Ors. v. State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharde Saksharta Prasarak Mandal, Ahmednagar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Atmaram Madhavrao Mundhe and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vasant Bisandas Gugale and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bhavsar Dilip Suklal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bharti Umesh Bhandarkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Babulal Rama Thakre Vs Bhagwan S Suryawanshi and Others