The court held that arrears were cleared, thus purging the alleged contempt and disposed of the contempt petition.
Contempt stood purged as dues were paid; the contempt petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.274 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3190 OF 2003
Babulal S/o Rama Thakre Vs. Bhagwan S.Suryawanshi and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.S.V.Natu, advocate for the petitioner. Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar, Addl. Government Pleader for the State.
Mr.A.D.Pawar, advocate for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND K.L.WADANE,JJ. Date : 23.11.2016.
PER COURT :
2
(K.L.WADANE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.23.11.2016. asp/office/Cp274.15
Babulal S/o Rama Thakre
Bhagwan S.Suryawanshi and others
S.V.Gangapurwala
K.L.Wadhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
