In a contempt petition, the High Court held that although the order was complied with belatedly, the liability for contempt was purged upon compliance. The petition was accordingly disposed of with no costs awarded.
Contempt petition disposed of; contempt stands purged; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.396 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8303 OF 2013
Sau. Bharti W/o Umesh Bhandarkar Vs. The State of
Maharashtra and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.R.M.Deshmukh, advocate for the petitioner Ms.R.P.Gour, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND K.L.WADANE,JJ. Date : 23.11.2016.
PER COURT :
2
(K.L.WADANE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.23.11.2016. asp/office/Cp396.16
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's liability for contempt of court, arising from the belated compliance of an order communicated by post, is extinguished.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sau. Bharti W/o Umesh Bhandarkar
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
