This writ petition challenges the non-disposal of an application seeking approval for suspension. The Single Bench directed the State to decide the application within two months and dismissed the petition.
Direction to Respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the application for suspension within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25-wp-1359-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1359 OF 2014
The Secretary, Lucy Sequeira Trust and Another ...Petitioners vs. State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
Mr. S.J. Panicker, for the Petitioners Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP for the Respondents-State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 28, 2016
P.C.:
March, 2014 the approval for suspension of Respondent No. 3 was applied but till date neither the prayer has been accepted nor rejected and no order has been passed on the application seeking approval for suspension.
counsel for the parties, we are inclined to dispose of the Petition by directing Respondent No. 2 to consider and take appropriate decision
1/2
Vishal Parekar
25-wp-1359-2014
on the Petitioner's application dated 5th March, 2014 (Exhibit 'F') as expeditiously as possible but in any case not later than two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Vishal Parekar
The Secretary, Lucy Sequeira Trust and Another
State of Maharashtra and Others
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
