Dismissed
Shri Ganesh Bharat Pawar and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCCP/35/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23-cp-35-2014.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.35 OF 2014
Office notes, Office memorandum of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and the Registrar’s orders
None for the Petitioner
Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM: SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.
DATED: 28th SEPTEMBER, 2016
. None for the Petitioner. The Contempt Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
Vishal Parekar 1 of 1
Anon
State
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court