This court rejected the Civil Application holding that since recovery was effected before the interim order dated 20.2.2015, no ground existed to allow the application, reserving other contentions for the final hearing.
Civil Application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12-caw-923.2016.sxw
1
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 923 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4477 OF 2014
Smt. Waghmare Rupali Satyawan and Ors. …. Applicants
Versus
the State of Maharashtra and ors. … Respondents
Mr. Saurabh Pakale a/w Mr. S.M. Katkar for the applicants.
Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for the respondent State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 27, 2016.
P.C.
Parties through their counsel.
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we find no ground to allow the Civil Application as we find that before passing of the interim order dated 20.2.2015, the recovery was already effected. As a result, Civil Application is rejected. The other contentions raised in the Civil Application will be considered while deciding the writ petition finally.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Application should be allowed given that recovery was already effected before the interim order was passed.
Smt. Waghmare Rupali Satyawan and Ors.
the State of Maharashtra and ors.
SHANTANU KEMKAR
MAKARAND KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
