Writ petition challenging a lapsed ordinance was disposed of as infructuous with no costs awarded.
Petition disposed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-1203.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1203 OF 2015
Kalayan Ganpatrao Kadam and others
...PETITIONERS
versus
The Union of India and others
...RESPONDENTS
Mr. Amol Chalak Advocate holding for Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for petitioners Mr. S.B. Deshpande, ASG for respondent No. 1 Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondents No. 2 to 4 and 8 Mr. K.K. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No. 7
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 27th JUNE, 2016.
Order :-
Sd/-
Sd/-
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
Kalayan Ganpatrao Kadam and others
The Union of India
S. V. Gangapurwala
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
