The petitioner filed a writ petition regarding an undecided application for rental compensation under the Land Acquisition Act. The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh application with the Special Land Acquisition Officer and mandated the authority to dispose of it within nine months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP-1176.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1176 OF 2015
Vijaykumar S/o Chenapa Mirche
...PETITIONER
versus
The State of Maharashtra and another ...RESPONDENTS
]
Mr. S.S. Halkunde, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, AGP for respondent No. 1
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 27th JUNE, 2016.
Order :-
2 WP-1176.15
Sd/-
Sd/-
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
MTK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's application for rental compensation was filed with the appropriate authority and, if not, how to proceed for deciding the entitlement.
Vijaykumar S/o Chenapa Mirche
The State of Maharashtra
K. K. Sonawane
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
