The petitioner sought permission to open a new Ashram School. The State rejected the proposal based on an existing Government policy against opening new schools, a decision previously upheld by this Court. The petition was dismissed as inappropriate to direct reconsideration under the current policy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
W.P.No.3356/09
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3356 OF 2009
Twaritapuri Education Society, through its Secretary, Shri Asaram S/o Gunaji Mane Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.J.N.Singh, advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND K.K.SONAWANE,JJ.
Date : 24.06.2016.
PER COURT :
view of the policy of the Government of opening new Ashram Schools for the children of denotified and Nomadic Tribes, the petitioner applied in the requisite form with prescribed fees for opening new Ashram School. The proposal of the petitioner was not considered. As such, the petitioner was required to file Writ Petition No.11/2009. In the said Writ Petition, this Court directed
the Respondents to consider the proposal of the petitioner for opening new Ashram School. The Respondents rejected the said
2
W.P.No.3356/09
proposal vide order dated 2.3.2009 on the sole ground that the Government has taken a decision not to grant permission for opening new Ashram School. The learned counsel submits that the Government decisions dated 31.8.2005 and 31.5.2006, would not come in the way of the petitioner as the proposal of the petitioner for start of new Ashram School was prior to the said Government policy. The Respondents had granted permission to another institution to open a new Ashram School. The petitioner is being discriminated. The Respondents be directed to grant permission to the petitioner to open new Ashram School.
3
W.P.No.3356/09
(K.K.SONAWANE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.24.06.2016. asp/office/wp3356.09
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was entitled to a direction to grant permission to open a new Ashram School despite an existing State policy against it.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.8597/2007Referred¶4
Twaritapuri Education Society
State of Maharashtra
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
K.K.SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
