Petitioner challenged Zilla Parishad's suspension order. Court found no interference needed as pending disciplinary and criminal proceedings made petition devoid of substance, disposing of it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 1129-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1129 OF 2016
Dattatraya Ramrao Jagdale
...PETITIONER
versus
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
...RESPONDENTS
Mr. M. P. Kale , Advocate for petitioner Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for respondents No.1 and 2 Mr.U. B. Bondar, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 & 4
CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 10th OCTOBER, 2016.
Order :-
Sd/-
Sd/-
MTK
Dattatraya Ramrao Jagdale
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
K.K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
