Applicant sought directions to force management to deposit backwages following a Tribunal judgment. Court held that the application amounted to a deferred interim prayer by the opposing side, which could be addressed via execution proceedings. Application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6830 OF 2016 IN WP/4238/2012
TULSHIRAM DUDHARAM JADHAV VERSUS SANT NAMDEO SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL AND OTHERS
Advocate for Applicant : Shri Godbole R.J. Advocate for Respondents 1 & 2 : Shri Tambde P.G. h/f Shri Rathod A.R. AGP for Respondent 3 : Shri Kutti P.N. Advocate for Respondents 4 : Shri Londhe S.S.
... CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. Dated: October 07, 2016
PER COURT :-
akl/d
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
2 - CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6830 OF 2016
impugned judgment, this Civil Application filed by the applicant would virtually amount to considering a prayer for interim relief by the respondent in the petition filed by the management. Needless to state, the respondent / applicant herein can always seek execution of the impugned order / judgment as the same has not been stayed by this Court. This application is, therefore, disposed off.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
akl/d
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant directions to manage to deposit backwages in the Applicant's pending Civil Application
TULSHIRAM DUDHARAM JADHAV
SANT NAMDEO SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
