Allowed

Pragati Sainathrao Patodekar v. the Dean Government Ayurved College Nanded and Others

Bombay HC10 Oct 2016WP/10436/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by a student seeking admission to Government Ayurved College under Scheduled Tribe quota. Court directed college to admit petitioner without insisting on original certificates and ordered Scrutiny Committee to decide validation proposal within one year.

What did the court decide?

Directed college to admit petitioner without insisting on original tribe certificate and validity certificate; directed Scrutiny Committee to decide validation within one year.

Pragati Sainathrao Patodekar Vs the Dean Government… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1 WP 10436-16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 10436 OF 2016

¶4

Pragati Sainathrao Patodekar ...PETITIONER

¶5

versus

¶6

The Dean Government Ayurved College Nanded & ors.

¶7

...RESPONDENTS

¶8

Mr. S. M. Vibhute, Advocate for petitioner Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for respondents

¶9

..... CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

¶10

DATED : 10^th OCTOBER, 2016.

¶11

Order :-

¶12

The petitioner claims to be belonging to “ Koli Mahadeo ” scheduled tribe and is held eligible for admission of BAMS course as against seat reserved for ST category. The petitioner has been admitted to Government Ayurved College, Nanded. The petitioner claims that proposal for verification of tribe certificate is forwarded to the respondent No. 3 - Scrutiny Committee and the matter is pending for consideration with respondent No. 3 - Scrutiny Committee. It is also further stated that original tribe certificate received by her from the competent authority is also tendered with Scrutiny Committee.

¶13

The petitioner makes a grievance that Dean of the Government Ayurved College, Nanded is not finalizing the admission on account of her failure to submit original tribe certificate and tribe validity certificate.

¶14

2 WP 10436-16

¶15

In the circumstances, this petition can be disposed of by directing respondent No. 1 - College to admit the petitioner to BAMS course without insisting for original tribe certificate and tribe validity certificate. The petitioner, however, shall tender photo copy of tribe certificate received by her and shall tender undertaking to the effect that she would produce tribe validity certificate after decision of the Scrutiny Committee in respect of tribe certificate validation proposal.

¶16

Respondent No. 3 - Scrutiny Committee is directed to take decision on the tribe certificate validation proposal of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year from today.

¶17

With directions as above, writ petition stands disposed of.

¶18

Sd/Sd/- [K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.]

¶19

MTK

Pragati Sainathrao Patodekar v. the Dean Government Ayurved College Nanded and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pragati Sainathrao Patodekar v. the Dean Government Ayurved College Nanded and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yunus Babulal Deshpande and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Loknete Amadar Kai M N Rajput @ Thansing Jibhau Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Other Thr Its Presiden Vs the State of Mahrashtra and Others

Tulshiram Dudharam Jadhav Vs Sant Namdeo Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Jambhrun Andh(Tanda) Thr Secretary and Others

Dattatraya Ramrao Jagdale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Anil Bhimrao More Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sandep Narayan Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others