This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vina k. 1 sr.22.wp.10327.2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2013
Bibhishan Pralhad Sherkhane … Petitioner
Vs
The Director of Education, Pune & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. A. B. Tajane for the petitioner. Ms. Nisha Mehra, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATE : 29 th NOVEMBER, 2016.
P.C. :
2 . In view of the aforesaid prayer, we allow the petitioner to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit a detailed representation or complaint before the first respondent in regard to the aforesaid alleged irregularities. In case, such
vina k. 2 sr.22.wp.10327.2013.doc
representation / complaint received by respondent no.1, the first respondent to look into the matter and take an appropriate steps / decision expeditiously on it in accordance with law after giving due opportunity of hearing to all concerned. Needless to say, we have not commented upon merits of the case and allegation made in the petition and the first respondent shall be free to take its own decision in respect of such representation / complaint. The petition is disposed of.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
Bibhishan Pralhad Sherkhane
The Director of Education, Pune
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
