Petitioners sought leave to withdraw Writ Petition No. 689 of 2015. The court accepted the prayer and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted; the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-WP-689-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.689 OF 2015
M/s. S.K. Enterprises
...Petitioners
vs.
Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Others ...Respondents
Mr. S.G. Deshmukh a/w. Mr. Rajas Naik i/b. S. Kandalkar, for the Petitioners.
Mr. D.A. Nalawade, for the Respondents.
Mr. Ramniklal Senjnani, the Petitioner party in person present.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 28, 2016
P.C.:
. On instruction from the Petitioner who is present in Court,
learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. The prayer is accepted. The Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Vishal Parekar
M/s. S.K. Enterprises
Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Others
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
