Disposed

Ratan Sitaram Pingat and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, School and Education Dept and Ors.

Bombay HC28 Nov 2016WP/7266/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of a writ petition filed by untrained teachers seeking regular payscale and arrears. The court directed the respondents to consider the claim in light of a specific prior judgment and take a decision within three months, expressly reserving comment on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondents to consider Petitioners' claim and take appropriate decision within three months.

Ratan Sitaram Pingat and Ors. Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1 of -Prodn-2-WP-72662016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7266 OF 2014

¶3

Shri Ratan Sitaram Pingat & Ors. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

¶4

...Petitioners.

¶5

...Respondents.

¶6

Mr. Vinod Sangvikar i/by Umesh Mankapure, Advocates for Petitioners. Ms. Rupali M. Shinde, AGP for State.

¶7

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

¶8

DATE : 28^th November 2016

¶9

PC :

¶10

Not on board. Taken on board. Production granted in

¶11

view of urgency.

¶12

1 Parties through their counsel. The Petitioners have filed this petition seeking directions to the Respondents to grant them regular payscale, differences and arrears of untrained teachers after completion of 3 years' probation period till the date of passing of D.Ed.Course and all other benefits as per 6^th Pay Commission.

¶13

2 Today when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the Petitioners has submitted that this petition may be disposed of by directing Respondent Nos.3 and 4 to consider Petitioners' claim keeping in view the law laid down by this Court in the case of Seema Khandu Takale v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. in Writ Petition No.7116 of 2011 decided on 24.4.2012.

¶14

Shivgan

¶15

2 of -Prodn-2-WP-72662016

¶16

2 Keeping in view the aforesaid limited prayer, we dispose of this petition by directing Respondent Nos.3 and 4 to consider Petitioners' grievance and take appropriate decision in regard to same keeping in view the law laid down by this Court in the case of Seema Khandu Takale (Supra). The Petitioners may submit fresh detail representation before the Respondent Nos.3 and 4.

¶17

3 Let decision as aforesaid be taken within three months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

¶18

4 Needless to mention that we have not commented upon the merits of the petition and petitioners' entitlement.

¶19

5 Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶20

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

¶21

(SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

¶22

Shivgan

¶23

3 of -Prodn-2-WP-7266-

¶24

2016

¶25

Shivgan

Ratan Sitaram Pingat and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, School and Education Dept and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ratan Sitaram Pingat and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, School and Education Dept and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Goods Transport Labour Board for Greater Mumbai Vs M/S. Pearl Freight Services Pvt. Ltd.

Smt Tangavva Chanabasappa Bhogade (Since Decd) through Lrs. Mr. Shankarling @ Basaveshwar C. Bhogad Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Revenue and Forests Dept. and Anr.

Shital Namdeo Khose and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, School and Education Dept and Ors.

M/S S.K.Enterprises Vs Slum Rehabilitation Authority and 3 Ors.

The State of Maharashtra through Secretary to Government Dept. of Social Justice and Special Asst. Vs Ramakant Shantaram Malpekar and Ors.

Shri. Ravi Prabhudas Mahbubani and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary to the Industries Energy and Labour Dept. and Ors.