Petition challenging denial of police protection dismissed on ground that the relevant period had already elapsed at the time of filing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 18-crwp1023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1023 OF 2016
Sayyed Arbaz Hussain
..Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
and ors.
..Respondents
Mr.Suvidh Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioner
Mr.S.W.Mundhe, APP for respondents
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 15, 2016
PER COURT :
Heard.
2.By filing this petition, the petitioner
has challenged the impugned order/letter dated
31.01.2015 issued by the Superintendent of Police,
Ahmednagar, by which the request made by the
petitioner for providing police protection for the
period from 31.01.2015 to 02.02.2015, has been
turned down.
2 18-crwp1023.odt
3.Since the period for which the petitioner
has sought police protection is over, we are not
inclined to entertain this petition. Hence, the
Writ Petition stands dismissed.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.][S.S. SHINDE, J.]
kbp
Sayyed Arbaz Hussain
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court