Disposed
Harishchandra Dhondiba Shete v. the State of Maharashtra and Other
Bombay HCWP/140/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
140.16WP
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
______________________________________________________ CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 140 OF 2016
HARISHCHANDRA DHONDIBA SHETE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHER
...
Advocate for petitioner : Mr.A.K. Gawali
A.P.P. for Respondent/State: Mr.A.R. Borulkar
Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr.Shantanu
Deshpande holding for Mr. N.V. Gaware
...
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. Dated: October 14, 2016
Heard the learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner, the learned A.P.P.
appearing for the Respondent-State and
the learned counsel appearing for
Respondent No.5.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner fairly states that so far as
the prayer clause `A' is concerned, the
same stands complied with/satisfied.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the
140.16WP
2
petitioner, on instructions, submits that
he is not pressing the prayer clause `B'.
4.In the circumstances, the Petition
stands disposed of.
(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J)
sga/
Harishchandra Dhondiba Shete
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court