Criminal Application challenging allegations of forged documents and conspiracy was rejected as it was not appropriate to interfere with the investigation at the current stage.
Criminal Application rejected; no interference with investigation at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 37-crappln3199.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3199 OF 2016
Vithal Kishan Godke,
Age 39 years, Occ. Business,
r/o. Phule Ambedkar Nagar,
Taroda (Bk),
Tq. and Dist. Nanded
and ors...Applicants
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra,
Through Police Station,
Shivajinagar, Nanded
and anr...Respondents
Mrs.A.N.Ansari, Advocate for Applicants
Mr.S.W.Mundhe, APP for respondent no.1
Mr.S.U.Natu, Advocate for respondent no.2
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 15, 2016
PER COURT :
Heard.
2.Apart from the allegations of creation of
the forged documents, there are allegations of
2 37-crappln3199.odt
conspiracy. In that view of the matter, at this
stage, it would not be appropriate to interfere in
the investigation.
3. We, therefore, are not inclined to
entertain this application at this stage. Hence,
the application stands rejected.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.][S.S. SHINDE, J.]
kbp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Application regarding allegations of forged documents and conspiracy should be entertained at the investigation stage.
Vithal Kishan Godke and ors
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court