Disposed

Shri Savant Popat Bhagwan and Ors. v. the Assistant Commissioner and Ors.

Bombay HC26 Aug 2016WP/10194/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Division Bench disposed of three connected writ petitions by granting liberty to the petitioners to submit representations before the competent authority within two weeks, relying on the precedent of Kiran Namdeo Shinde, with a direction to the authority to decide within two months of receipt.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to submit representation within two weeks; competent authority directed to examine and decide within two months of receipt.

Shri Savant Popat Bhagwan and Ors. Vs the Assistant… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2016)

908-909-910.sxw

Hvn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 22941 OF 2016

¶6

Shri Sopan Krishna Karandee & ors. ..Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents

¶7

with

¶8

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 22942 OF 2016

¶9

Shri Savant Popat Bhagwan & ors.

¶10

..Petitioners

¶11

Versus

¶12

The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents

¶13

with

¶14

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 23077 OF 2016

¶15

Shri. Sanjay Suresh Gaikwad and Anr. Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors.

¶16

..Petitioners

¶17

..Respondents

¶18

Mr. I.M. Khairdi, advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for the State.

¶19

CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, J J. DATE : 26th AUGUST, 2016.

¶20

P. C. :

¶21

Parties through their counsel.

¶22

Mr. Khairdi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶23

the question involved in these petitions is covered by the order dated 21st September, 2013, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Kiran Namdeo Shinde and ors. vs. the State of

¶24

2 908-909-910.sxw

¶25

Maharashtra and ors. in writ petition No.2358 of 2013 and other Connected writ petitions. He submitted that these petitions may be disposed of by directing the appropriate authority to consider and take an appropriate decision on the petitioners' claim. He submitted that the petitioners shall submit representation before the competent authority within two weeks from today.

¶26

In view of the aforesaid statement, as agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, these petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit the representation before the competent authority within two weeks. On receipt of the same, the competent authority shall examine it and, in case, the petitioners' case is based on the decision of the Division Bench in Kiran Namdeo Shinde (supra), an appropriate decision and consequential relief may be granted in their favour within our months from the date of receipt of such representation. Accordingly, the petitions stand disposed of.

¶27

[MAKARAND KARNIK, J.]

¶28

[SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.]

Shri Savant Popat Bhagwan and Ors. v. the Assistant Commissioner and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Savant Popat Bhagwan and Ors. v. the Assistant Commissioner and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yasmin Mahinoddin Shaikh Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept. and Ors.

Nuance Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and 6 Ors.

Dindoshi Pada Janata Sevak Sangh Vs State of Maharashtra and 7 Ors.

Manubhai Paragji Vashi Vs Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation and 5 Ors.

Shri Sopan Krishna Karande and Ors. Vs the Assistant Commissioner and Ors.

Shri. Sanjay Suresh Gaikwad and Anr. Vs the Assistant Commissioner, Social Welfare Office and Ors.