The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner, despite a reference to the petitioner's statement to withdraw a related petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
52-wp-2291-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2291 OF 2015
Dindoshi Pada Janata Sangh ...Petitioner vs. State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner Mr. P.J. Thorat, for Respondent No. 6. Mr. Y.R. Shah, for Respondent Nos. 5(A) to 5(L) and 5(I) to 5(K) Mr. U.S. Upadhyay, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 4 and 8.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 25, 2016
P.C.:
. In view of the statement made by the Petitioner in Writ Petition (L) No. 1711 of 2016 that he will withdraw the Writ Petition (L) No. 666 of 2015 which is the present Writ Petition No. 2291 of 2015, the learned counsel for Respondent No. 5 submits that this Petition does not survive. Be that as it may, since no one is appearing for the Petitioner, the Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Vishal Parekar
Dindoshi Pada Janata Sangh
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
