The Court dismissed the petition as infructuous following a subsequent notification by the Food Safety & Standards Authority of India dated 30th July, 2016.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; points raised left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43-wp-1099-2015
WRIT PETITION NO.1099 OF 2015
Nuance Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner vs.
Union of India and Others ...Respondents
Mr. Mayank Grover a/w. Mr. Praveer Shetty i/b. Res Legal, for the Petitioner. Mr. A.M. Sethna a/w. Mr. P.S. Gujar, for Respondent No. 1. Mr. U.S. Upadhyay, AGP for the State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 25, 2016
P.C.:
. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in view
of the subsequent notification dated 30th July, 2016 issued by the Food Safety & Standards Authority of India, this Petition has rendered infructuous. Accordingly the Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
1/2
Vishal Parekar
43-wp-1099-2015
entitlement of the Petitioner to get the refund and the Authority will
be free to take the decision in accordance with law.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Vishal Parekar
Nuance Group (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
