The dismissal of the criminal writ petition was allowed after the petitioner sought and granted liberty to withdraw the petition with a direction to approach the appropriate court.
Petitioner granted liberty to withdraw the writ petition and to take up appropriate remedy before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1019 OF 2016
(Bhikaji s/o Ganpati Chorghade VS. The State of
Maharashtra and others)
Mr. T.M. Venjane, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. S.W. Munde, A.P.P. for the respondent/State
CORAM :S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 4th October, 2016
PER COURT:
The learned counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw the petition
with further liberty to take up the appropriate remedy
before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty
as prayed for.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL][S.S. SHINDE]
JUDGE JUDGE
npj/criwp1019-2016
Bhikaji s/o Ganpati Chorghade
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court