The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Appellate Side, Bench at Aurangabad) dismissed criminal applications as withdrawn with liberty to apply for discharge, subject to the caveat that the liberty is unavailable if the charge has already been framed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3144.16appln
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
|
Office Notes, Office
||_______________|
|---|---|
|Memoranda of Coram, |
appearances, Court's
|
orders or directions
and Registrar's orders
||
Court's or Judge's orders
||
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3144 OF 2016 WITH APPLN/4904/2016 IN APPLN/3144/2016 WITH APPLN/4905/2016 IN APPLN/3144/2016
VISHWAJEET @ ATUL S/O AHRIMANTRAO SHINDE
AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANR
Advocate for applicant/petitioner:Mr.R.A. Jaiswal
APP for Respondent/State : Mr.A.R. Borulkar
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: October 01, 2016
The learned counsel appearing for the
applicant,oninstructions,seeks
permission to withdraw the applications
with liberty to take out the appropriate
application for discharge before the
concerned Court.
2.The applications are dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
3144.16appln 2
However, we make it clear that the
liberty granted today to the applicant
will not be available, in case, the
charge is already framed by the concerned
Court.
sga/
Vishwajeet @ Atul S/o Ahrimantrao Shinde
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court