Criminal Writ Petition rejected as raising disputed questions of fact. The Court refused to entertain the appeal against impugned order. No grounds for Quashing/setting aside the FIR were found.
The Criminal Writ Petition stood rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1233.16WP
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1233 OF 2016
MAYUR S/O PRAMOD KSHIRE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.R.S. Shinde
holding for Mr. Sonar Anudeep D.
AGP for Respondent/State:Mr.A.R. Borulkar
...
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. Dated: October 05, 2016
…
Heard. We are not inclined to
entertain the Petition, which raises
disputed questions of facts. Apart from
it, there are allegations in the F.I.R.
that the Directors with borrowers
conspired with each other and bank is
duped by granting huge amount of loan on
the basis of the forged documents. Hence,
the Criminal Writ Petition stands
rejected.
(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J)
sga/
Mayur S/o Pramod Kshire
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court