This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil77.16.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.77 OF 2016
Balaprashad s/o Ramnarayan Toshniwal
Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.Avinash A. Khande, advocate holding for Mr.G.C.Navandar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.A.B.Girase, Government Pleader for Respondents No.1 & 2.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
DATE : 27th June, 2016
PER COURT:
Heard.
Petition is misconceived.
Hence stands dismissed with liberty to file fresh
petition, if deemed appropriate.
K.L.WADANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
adb/pil77.16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the public interest litigation admits jurisdiction or merits being allowed.
Balaprashad s/o Ramnarayan Toshniwal
State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
