Civil application rejected as devoid of substance because the applicant had already been permitted to withdraw 75% of the deposited amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA 4212/16 in FA 282/14
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4212/2016
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.282/2014
Baburao Bapurao Iylane.
...Applicant..
Versus
Maharashtra State Industrial
Development Corporation, Latur
& another.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri Girish N. Kulkarni (Mardikar), Advocate for
applicant.
Shri S.B. Bhosale, Advocate for respondent no.1.
Shri A.B. Girase, Govt.Pleader for respondent no.2.
.....
CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
K.L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE: 24.06.2016
ORDER :
The applicant has already been permitted to withdraw
75% of the amount deposited by the acquiring body. We do
not find any reason to cause interference in the earlier
order passed by this Court. Hence, civil application,
being devoid of substance, stands rejected.
(K.L. WADANE, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.)
ndk/ c2461627.doc
Baburao Bapurao Iylane
Maharashtra State Industrial Development Corporation, Latur
R.M. BORDE
K.L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court