Petitioner withdrew Public Interest Litigation filed under Article 226 of the Constitution to submit representations regarding alleged environmental rule violations via legal notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1/2 67.16-pil.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 67 OF 2016
Rosalie LX Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. ... Petitioner. V/s. Union of India and others. ... Respondents.
D.S.Patil with G.S.Godbole, Senior Advocate for the petitioner.
Sandesh Patil i/b. D.P.Singh for respondent No.1- UOI.
C.P.Yadav, AGP for respondent No.2- State.
S.U.Deshmukh with Ms.Rupali Dixit for respondent No.5.
Prashant Kamble i/b. A.S.Rao for respondent No.7.
CORAM : D.H.WAGHELA, C.J. AND M.S.SONAK, J. DATE : 27th April 2016.
P.C. :
The petition is sought to be withdrawn with a view to making an appropriate representation with factual details of alleged violation of rules, in the form of legal notice to the authorities
skn 2/2 67.16-pil.sxw
concerned. After awaiting reply to such notice, if at all it is issued and served upon the authorities concerned, the petitioner shall have liberty to file a fresh proper petition clearly pointing out the violation of any rule made under the provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
(M.S.SONAK, J.) CHIEF JUSTICE
Rosalie LX Cooperative Housing Society Ltd.
Union of India
D.H.WAGHELA
M.S.SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
