Allowed

Sanjay Eknath Marathe v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Bombay HC25 Apr 2016PIL/45/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In PIL 10-PIL-45-16, the High Court at Aurangabad allowed an interim order dated March 28, 2016, directing the return of Rs. 20,000 to the petitioner. The court disposed of the petition by directing the Registry to also grant Rs.5,000 to the High Court Bar Association, Aurangabad.

What did the court decide?

Return of Rs. 20,000 to petitioner and Rs. 5,000 to Library, High Court Bar Association, Aurangabad.

Sanjay Eknath Marathe Vs the State of Mah and… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1 10-PIL-45-16.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 45 OF 2016

¶4

SANJAY EKNATH MARATHE
VERSUS

¶5

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

¶6

Mr.B.S.Deshmukh, advocate for petitioner

¶7

Mr.S.B.Yawalkar, AGP for respondents - State

¶8

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 25, 2016

¶9

PER COURT :

¶10

Heard.

¶11

2]The learned AGP appearing for the respondents-

¶12

State, on instructions, submits that the
respondents/authorities have canceled the previous

¶13

auction process initiated on the basis of the
tender notice dated 23rd March, 2016 published in
'Daily Lokmat'.

¶14

3]In that view of the matter, for the reasons

¶15

which are assigned in the interim order dated 28th

¶16

2 10-PIL-45-16.odt

¶17

March, 2016, we allow this Public Interest
Litigation in terms of prayer clause (B).

¶18

4]Needless to observe that if the respondents/
authorities have undertaken the auction process,

¶19

the same should be in accordance with the
guidelines issued in the Government Resolution
dated 12th March, 2013 and other relevant procedure
prescribed by the Government.

¶20

5]The learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner graciously submits that an amount of
Rs.5,000/- out of the amount deposited by the
petitioner, may be given to the Library, High
Court Bar Association, Aurangabad.

¶21

6]In that view of the matter, the Registry to
return an amount of Rs.20,000/- (Rs.Twenty
Thousand) to the petitioner and give an amount of
Rs.5,000/- (Five Thousand) to the Library, High
Court Bar Association, Aurangabad.

¶22

3 10-PIL-45-16.odt

¶23

7] The Public Interest Litigation stands disposed of accordingly.

¶24

8] The parties to act on authenticated copies of this order.

¶25

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.][S.S. SHINDE, J.]

¶26

kbp

Sanjay Eknath Marathe v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Eknath Marathe v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Edwin Bretto and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and 8 Ors.

Mohan S/O Marotrao Karemore Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Its Secty., and 3 Ors.

Rahul Sharad Kurekar and Another Vs the National Highway Authority of India, through Its Chairman, and Others

Swarup Suresh Khedekar Vs State of Maharashtra and 3 Others

Rosalie Lx Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Shri. Chengde Shashikant Premraj Vs State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary and Ors.

Rahul Annarao Lamture and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Eknath Dashrath Kachare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Phoenix Foundation Sanstha through Its Treasurer Amar Pasha Patel Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Abid Hussain Zainoddin Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ansari Sadequa Bano Shafique Ahmed Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Jayashree Bhaskar Sonawane Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Devendra Madan Kakde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Swati Kakasaheb Pawar Vs Sachin Nagnath Jagtap and Another